<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TimeforBlogging - Latest Comments in CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://timeforblogging.disqus.com/</link><description>Blogging, Website Tips, eCommerce, Forums and Web-Entrepreneurship</description><atom:link href="https://timeforblogging.disqus.com/cnn_secretly_endorses_barack_obama/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:47:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for this site. it is really informative.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Atlanta Discounted Houses</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I voted for Hillary Clinton.&lt;br&gt;He is really a woman with a big heart and not so selfish.&lt;br&gt;Sad that she lost the competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like yous blog. Its everyday so informative. Go on that way!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also think you hit the nail on the head with this one. It is obvious the Obama has been a favorite of the media, and I also know that some of the other candidates did not recieve there fair share of air time to be able to get there message out. It is sad that the media is this way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Libby</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Secretly?  Isn't it obvious?  CNN is selling us Obamaism, a new brand of propaganda to steer our votes. It started way before any of the primaries.  There were several fireside chat specials with Obama that I am sure he didn't pay for.  None of the other candidates had any specials.  I thought it odd, even back then.  Now it borders on the ridiculous.  Not only are they grandstanding for Obama by applauding his endorsements, speeches, wins and ability to get young voters interested in politics again, but they are cutting off Hillary's speeches with commercial breaks and critcising her and her husband at every opportunity.  They don't mention her endorsements. For instance, excluding Caroline and Ted, the rest of the Kennedy's (Robert's children included) are endorsing Hillary. Has anyone heard that mentioned on CNN?  No. Why...they want us to believe all the Kennedys are endorsing Obama.   Open your eyes people! The media is trying to control you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ariadne Green</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good post. I agree 100%. There's no media outlet out there that isn't biased and I wish they'd just come out and admit it, rather than doing it covertly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THE  NEWS MEDIA IS NOT ONLY BIASED FOR CERTAIN POLITICAL CANDIDATES BUT ON MANY ISSUES RE:THE DECISIONS MADE BY THE PRESIDENT, CONGRESS ECT. &lt;br&gt;     FOR INSTANCE, HOW MUCH MORE SPECTACULAR ARE NEWS STORIES IN TIME OF WAR, THAN IN TIME OF PEACE?&lt;br&gt;     I HATE TO SAY IT BUT, THE MORE SPECTACULAR THE STORY, THE MORE THEY GET VIEWERS, SELL PAPERS ECT.THE BOTTOM LINE IS THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR, PERIOD. &lt;br&gt;     THEY PROBABLY SEE OBAMA AS THE ONE WHO WILL CAUSE THE MOST TALK AMONG PEOPLE, AND SELL THE MOST IN THE NEWS!!&lt;br&gt;                                                                     TODD&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">las angles headshot photograph</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know but it seems like CNN has been anointing him since the 2004 elections. He wins his first federal office and they were going ga-ga over him. I just don't know. Whenever the media goes that ga-ga over anointing him, it makes me wonder why.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed the debate but that is pretty interesting.  I think Obama is a cool dude.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good luck to obama, but where is rudy?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chilli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:40:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you think that's something, you should have seen the New Hampshire republican debate on Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes. They would laugh every time Ron Paul spoke, even when it was completely uncalled for (when he was just beginning his answers, before he even got to the point). They asked you to text in your vote after the debate, and when he won all Hannity would say is "someone must be texting again and again for him". They treat him like a senile old man, meanwhile he's the only one who made any sense in the debate... So yeah, it sounds very similar to CNN. It's really unfortunate&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crystal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:42:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huh, who would have thunk it?  CNN showing favoritism???  I'm appalled, outraged, and not a bit surprised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:25:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow! Very interesting numbers there. I second Paul's thoughts on whether we will see any correction or whether the trend will continue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lucy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:30:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amazing, CNN should be taken to the back yard and switched.   I'll be interested to see if this trend continues in the months to come and how it will affect the outcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed the debate, but I'm surprised at the amount of pull he has seeing his short track history and historically radical points of view&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Goyin Forum</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll have to say that no matter what tv station you watch or which side of the political fence you stand on, there will always be some bias in the media. Always has been. Always will be. The best solution is to offer two sides and let people decide for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Ward</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it's just shows how much attention each candidate was given... It's not them who asked for it, so why would you talk about favoritism?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Early Riser</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This post was really interesting considering the fact that it concerns the senatorial polls.Barrak Obama has been attacked for many issues that need a tough stance.And given the time limit, it only does justice to him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Clebsch Gordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow!  That info blows me away.  There certainly seems to be a favoritism employed.  Really makes you question as a voter whether or not you really have any say or if there are higher powers pulling the strings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;This stuff gives the real information one needs. One can feel like reaching the destination.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a query though â€“ Usual sites like &lt;a href="http://dig.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dig.com"&gt;dig.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://muti.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="muti.com"&gt;muti.com&lt;/a&gt; declare â€œspamâ€ when I try bookmarking there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I donâ€™t have any spam pages or websites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you help me regarding this matter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Paine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453838</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, I missed the debate, but this is some pretty interesting data to be sure.    I don't know if I can completely conclude with your analysis, simply because I didn't watch, but I certainly don't put it past CNN to play favorites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric S.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have exactly the same stuff going on down here in Oz.  We've got an election coming up, and the ABC desperately wants Obama equivalent Kevin Rudd to win.  News LTD (Murdoch) papers want incumbent John Howard to win.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both say they're balanced.  But we know that's not true.  I think they should all just wear their biases on their sleeves and duke it out openly!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:05:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;interesting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:47:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It only really gets dangerous when one media group owns the most real estate. I saw the daily show last night and they were discussing this exact problem, saying how there used to be dozens of independant papers in NY, now they're all owned by a few large companies :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Newspaper Printers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:06:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Secretly Endorses Barack Obama</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/07/24/cnn-secretly-endorses-barack-obama/#comment-15453834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm I like your statistical charts- the candidates look like pez dispensers- do you sell them on eBay? If so I will bid on the Hillary and the Barack... I am still secretly undecided!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle Gartner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>