<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>TimeforBlogging - Latest Comments in Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://timeforblogging.disqus.com/</link><description>Blogging, Website Tips, eCommerce, Forums and Web-Entrepreneurship</description><atom:link href="https://timeforblogging.disqus.com/google_brings_the_smack_down_with_pr_changes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:07:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well people flip out whenever they hear about a PageRank change one way or another, people link to warez sites and wonder why they dropped from a PR3 to a PR0, etc.  It is just visual pagerank people, not the thing that they are actually ranking our sites based on ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Web Hosting Reviews</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ya, I agree with matt points me too got so many paid back links for my sites but it didn't affect my sites PR, I will careful about your points because i spend more money for my sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peter's credit report</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:51:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IDK what I think...&lt;br&gt;My pagerank has gone up because I never sold links...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Texan Democrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Matt:  That makes perfect sense;  Google only tends to update the toolbar page rank every three or four months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Walls:  The quality of each links is &lt;b&gt;far&lt;/b&gt; more important than the total number of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Mike:  Page rank, while not very useful, is a measure of links, not visitors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@m07:  I don't see anything anti-competitive going on.  Google &lt;i&gt;encourages&lt;/i&gt; people to give $300 a site to Yahoo, one of Google's oldest competitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Forrest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got so many paid links for my site. If sites/blogs being penalised for selling links, my site should be suffer by PR drop. But nothing happened in PR for past 3 months in my site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt on holiday</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my niche fishing blogs with only 3 backlinks went from a 0 to a 3. I was totally shocked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">decorative wall crosses</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:12:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Strange but true, 1 of my domains went from 3 to 0 PR even it has a lot of visitors.. :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:38:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;google is trying to be as much powerful as it can to destroy its competitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m07</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 06:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All those guys recover their pagerank, they just tweak the paid links it a redirect 302 and everything was ok again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hipotecas y Finanzas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, and nice links too (my first time here). Any indication how this latest smack down has affected "navigational queries"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hi, very nice blog, I invite to my side. I greet&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vip crew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:50:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i have heard many sites/blogs being penalised for selling links is it true.if so then our only support is directories.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m07</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:10:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Penalized for selling links?,,  But how do they identify sites that do sell links?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">djahna</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My blog - the one I'm signing this with - went from 0 to 3.  The site on the main domain went up:  the home page and lots of internal ones.  I'm writing this because you said:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™ve been reading up on this for 2 days now and have yet to hear anything good about this situation. I have heard rumblings from people that they have seen PR upgrades, but havenâ€™t found any proof. Iâ€™d love to hear from anyone who has seen an increase. Maybe we can learn from exploring these sites what has really happened.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Forrest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:40:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With las update google has really slaps many bloggers. I'm also affected.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alberghi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453894</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My blog went from PR0 to PR3.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steeltowndubber</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:36:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    Last week I noticed my ActiveRain blog drop from PG 4 to 3, however my website which was only a PG2 went to a PG3...go figure. Perhaps you are onto something with all the backlinks in blogs..? Keep us posted...I'm counting on you;) L~&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Monroe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:44:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have heard that google is discounting the weight of directory links.  That is the most popular form of paid link building.  I would have to say that most of the time people are buying page rank on the directories and I know it is a good business for some but it does help to level the playing field to devalue these links.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess you can tell I don't buy links.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tiffany Lighting</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi!&lt;br&gt;I don't know what happened but my blog PR went from 0 to 2?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SunlightFlavour</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:12:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Brings the Smack Down with PR Changes</title><link>http://www.timeforblogging.com/2007/10/26/google-brings-the-smack-down-with-pr-changes/#comment-15453890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also suffered a PR drop more than 2 months ago and traced (possibly) the cause to incoming links in the form of spam URLs resulting to 404s on my site. In a matter of days, Google reported 3000+ 404 errors on my site so I decided to take action on it. Now my PR is back up to PR4 - still one notch less from the original PR5. Full details of what I did can be found at &lt;a href="http://seo.mikelopez.info/2007/10/27/pr-update-mikelopezinfo-goes-back-up-to-pr4/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://seo.mikelopez.info/2007/10/27/pr-update-mikelopezinfo-goes-back-up-to-pr4/"&gt;http://seo.mikelopez.info/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Lopez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>